Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1023745#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B190708.
- aggregation creator B190709.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2010".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1023745.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0001-6810.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: an investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium)".
- aggregation abstract "The electoral system is an important factor influencing female representation in Parliament. There is a consensus that a proportional representation (PR) system is more beneficial for women than a majoritarian system. Since there is a lot of variety in PR systems and since recent literature suggests that how actors cope with institutional provisions should be looked at more closely, we have investigated why women receive fewer votes in an open-list PR system. More in particular, it was our aim to find out whether women receive fewer votes because of voter bias or systemic bias. We have analyzed three variables influenced by systemic actors (parties, society and media) that have a substantial effect on the number of votes: media attention, campaign expenditures and list position. Our analysis of the 2003 federal Belgian elections shows that women are disadvantaged on these three variables and that as a consequence they obtain fewer votes. There is no voter bias, but a systemic bias. These disadvantages can be due either to individual characteristics influenced by education and society (less ambition, less convinced of capabilities, and so on) or, more importantly, to party-or media-related factors (a.o. list composition, designation of campaign budgets and spokespersons). Acta Politica (2010) 45, 468-490. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.6".
- aggregation authorList BK449469.
- aggregation endPage "490".
- aggregation issue "4".
- aggregation startPage "468".
- aggregation volume "45".
- aggregation aggregates 1023747.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1023745.
- aggregation similarTo ap.2010.6.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1023745.