Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1057511#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "C3".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2010".
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1057511.yaml.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "European Communication Research and Education Association".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "The Productive Power of Sublime Reflection and Communication".
- aggregation abstract "I address the problem of the communicability of sublime feelings and judgements, and take issue with ‘postmodern’ treatments of the sublime. These ‘postmodern’ approaches proclaim the sublime’s ineluctable violence, rupture, and negativity (Deleuze 1984; Derrida 1987; Lyotard 1994). I offer a reconstruction of Kant’s theory of the sublime, and argue that an aesthetics of the sublime undermines conventional conceptuality, but cannot be reduced to mere ‘negative’ feeling (cf. Pillow 2000). Drawing on examples of modern and contemporary art, my approach emphasises the positive role of sublime reflection in the (indeterminate) understanding of contextual wholes and never finished shared forms of life. I aim to show how the productive power of sublime communication and reflection can generate shared webs of imaginative understanding. Contra Makkreel (1998) and Pillow (2000), I argue that sublime understanding is not a mere interpretive response to semantic wholes, nor merely advances our sense-making pursuits but also enhances and stretches our conscious affective engagement with the uncanny aspects of life. In this way, sublime reflection contributes to grasping how we make sense of meaningful wholes and altering worlds through the spontaneous invention of communicable alternative webs of imaginative understanding. Deleuze, Gilles (1984). Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press). Derrida, Jacques (1987). The Truth in Painting (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Makkreel, Rudolf (1998). “Sublimity, Genius and the Explication of Aesthetic Ideas,” in Herman Parret (ed.), Kants Ästhetik / Kant’s Aesthetics / L’esthétique de Kant (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter). Lyotard, Jean-François (1994). Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (Stanford: Standford Unversity Press). Pillow, Kirk (2000). Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).".
- aggregation authorList BK291665.
- aggregation startPage "258".
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1057511.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1057511.