Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1108932#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B379704.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1108932.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0040-5825.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "The epistemic predicament of a pseudoscience: social constructivism confronts Freudian psychoanalysis".
- aggregation abstract "Social constructivist approaches to science have often been dismissed as inaccurate accounts of scientific knowledge. In this paper, we take the claims of robust social constructivism seriously and attempt to find a theory which does instantiate the epistemic predicament as described by SC. We argue that Freudian psychoanalysis, in virtue of some of its well known epistemic complications and conceptual confusions, provides a perfect illustration of what SC claims is actually going on in science. In other words, the features SC mistakenly ascribes to science in general correctly characterize the epistemic status of Freudian psychoanalysis. This sheds some light on the internal disputes in the field of psychoanalysis, on the sociology of psychoanalytic movement, and on the “war” that has been waged over Freud’s legacy with his critics. In addition, our analysis offers an indirect and independent argument against SC as an account of bona fide science, by illustrating what science would look like if it were to function as SC claims it does.".
- aggregation authorList BK686369.
- aggregation endPage "179".
- aggregation issue "2".
- aggregation startPage "159".
- aggregation volume "77".
- aggregation aggregates 1108943.
- aggregation aggregates 1210015.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1108932.
- aggregation similarTo j.1755-2567.2011.01098.x.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1108932.