Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1854786#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1854786.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0022-8877.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "Kant and whewell on bridging principles between metaphysics and science".
- aggregation abstract "In this essay, I call attention to Kant's and Whewell's attempt to provide bridging principles between a priori principles and scientific laws. Part of Kant's aim in the Opus postumum (ca. 1796-1803) was precisely to bridge the gap between the metaphysical foundations of natural science and physics by establishing intermediary concepts or 'Mittelbegriffe' (henceforth this problem is referred to as 'the bridging-problem'). It will be argued, on the basis of a close reading of Whewell's Notebooks on Induction, that Whewell's account of the Idea of Cause (and by extension, his doctrine of Fundamental Ideas in general) grew out of his dissatisfaction with Kantian philosophy of science and its seeming inability to solve the bridging-problem. This analysis throws new light on the importance of Kantianism in Whewell's philosophy, for it will be shown that Whewell took over and transformed Kant's idea of a priori principles as conditions for the establishment of proper knowledge about the world (without always clinging to Kant's exact differentiation between them) and that Whewell was trying to address a typical Kantian topic: namely, to show how scientific knowledge could be both empirical and necessary and how the gap between metaphysics and physics could be bridged.".
- aggregation authorList BK440390.
- aggregation endPage "45".
- aggregation issue "1".
- aggregation startPage "22".
- aggregation volume "102".
- aggregation aggregates 1854869.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1854786.
- aggregation similarTo KANT.2011.002.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1854786.