Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1862204#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "C3".
- aggregation creator B74035.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2010".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1862204.yaml.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "Applied philosophy extended to experimental philosophy: a case study in medical diagnostics".
- aggregation abstract "Physicians are often seen as experts (or authorities) in a medical diagnostic process. Medical researchers are interested in how authority works in medicine. Philosophers have argued that scientific , moral , or almost all knowledge depends for its acquisition on trust in the testimony of others. Trust enhances cooperation; because it removes the incentive to check up on other people, making cooperation with trust less complicated than cooperation without it . The argument for the need to trust what others say is that no person has the intellect, experience, and time necessary to learn, independently, every fact about the world . This and the continuing specialization of medical knowledge, calls in the need to base one’s arguments on authority. Doing this reduces the notion of trust to a weaker form, i.e. blind trust, resulting in major implications for the way we think about medical decision making. Experimental research dealing with authority arguments in clinical practice will open up physicians’ eyes on the actual role authority plays in decision-making. Thus, experimental philosophy can be a helpful tool for applied philosophy.".
- aggregation authorList BK188673.
- aggregation aggregates 1862285.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1862204.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1862204.