Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1976114#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A2".
- aggregation creator B441247.
- aggregation creator B441248.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1976114.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:2029-283X.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Medicine and Health Sciences".
- aggregation title "Surgical protocol and short-term clinical outcome of immediate placement in molar extraction sockets using a wide body implant".
- aggregation abstract "Objectives: Implant placement in molar extraction sockets can be difficult due to complex multi-root anatomy and the lack of predictable primary stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of an 8 - 9 mm diameter tapered implant, designed to be placed in molar extraction sockets. Material and methods: Patients treated at least 1 year before with a Max® implant (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) were invited for a clinical examination. Variables collected were surgical and prosthetic protocol, implant dimension and smoking habits. Peri-implant bone level was determined on peri-apical radiographs and compared to baseline, being implant insertion. Results: 98 implants had been placed in 89 patients. One implant had failed. Thirty eight patients representing 47 implants (maxilla 26, mandible 21) were available for clinical examination. Mean bone loss was 0.38 mm (SD 0.48; range - 0.50 – 1.95) after a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 12 - 35). Implant success was 97.9%. Around 30 implants, a bone substitute was used to fill the residual space, but this did not affect the bone loss outcome. Bone loss was only significantly different between maxilla and mandible (0.48 mm vs. 0.27 mm) and between the 8 and 9 mm diameter implants (0.23 mm vs. 0.55 mm). A full papilla was present at 71% of the interproximal sites and irrespective of bone loss. Conclusions: The Max® implant demonstrated good primary stability, when placed in molar extraction sockets, with limited bone loss over time.".
- aggregation authorList BK769908.
- aggregation issue "3".
- aggregation volume "2".
- aggregation aggregates 1976116.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1976114.
- aggregation similarTo jomr.2011.2301.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1976114.