Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1980039#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "C1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980039.yaml.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "Ghent University, Department of Philosophy and moral sciences".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "Rules regresses".
- aggregation abstract "Is the content of our thoughts determined by norms such as 'if I know that p, then I ought to believe that p'? Gluer and Wikforss (2009) set forth a regress argument for a negative answer. The aim of this paper is to clarify and evaluate this argument. In the first part I show how it (just like an argument from Wittgenstein 1953) can be taken as an instance of an argument schema. In the second part, I evaluate the relevant premises in some detail, and argue that the dialectical situation is slightly more complicated than a 'dilemma of regress and idleness', as Gluer and Wikforss have dubbed it.".
- aggregation authorList BK322828.
- aggregation endPage "92".
- aggregation startPage "79".
- aggregation aggregates 1982742.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1980039.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1980039.