Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/2005374#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2012".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 2005374.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0927-5568.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Between 'believers' and 'opponents': critical discussions on children's rights".
- aggregation abstract "Practices in the fijield of children’s rights presuppose an agreement on what children’s rights are. Consequently, the implementation of more children’s rights is logically better for children. But is this really the case? In this paper, we try to critically answer this question. The problem with this question however is that from the outset, it becomes overshadowed by a highly polarized discussion between what Stammers (2009) calls ‘uncritical proponents’ at the one hand and ‘uncritical opponents’ at the other hand. The former have a blind belief in the obvious positive efffects of children’s rights. The latter radically deny the value children’s rights can have in the aim to realize a greater respect for children. Neither positions are constitutive in strengthening the framework of children’ rights since they both start from a ‘consensus thinking’ on children’s rights. What current thinking in children’s rights lacks is “critique”, considered as questioning and analyzing assumptions that are embedded in current practices in the fijield of children’s rights. In this article, we argue for the development of a tradition of “critical proponents” in children’s rights in a plea for a tradition of ‘critical children’s rights studies’.".
- aggregation authorList BK562427.
- aggregation endPage "15".
- aggregation issue "1".
- aggregation startPage "1".
- aggregation volume "20".
- aggregation aggregates 2005376.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 2005374.
- aggregation similarTo 157181812X626417.
- aggregation similarTo LU-2005374.