Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/2042261#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B448586.
- aggregation creator B448587.
- aggregation creator B448588.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 2042261.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0885-579X.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "The structure of personality disorders: comparing the DSM-IV-TR Axis II classification with the Five-Factor Model framework using structural equation modeling".
- aggregation abstract "Earlier factor analytical studies on the empirical validity of the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychological Association, 2000) Axis II classification have offered little support for the current three-cluster structure. In his large-scale meta-analysis of previously published personality disorder correlation matrices, O'Connor (2005) found four factors, corresponding to the neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness domains of the five-factor model of personality. In the present study, this dimensional four-factor model and the categorical DSM three-cluster structure were fitted to the Assessment of DSM-IV Personality Disorders questionnaire (ADP-IV; Schotte & De Doncker, 1994) scale scores using structural equation modelling. The results strongly favored the dimensional model, which also resembled other well-founded four-factor proposals (Livesley, Jang, & Vernon, 1998; Widiger & Simonsen, 2005). Moreover, a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis showed that this model was highly invariant and thus generalizable across two large clinical (n = 1,029) and general population (n = 659) samples.".
- aggregation authorList BK782032.
- aggregation endPage "396".
- aggregation issue "3".
- aggregation startPage "378".
- aggregation volume "25".
- aggregation aggregates 2042286.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 2042261.
- aggregation similarTo LU-2042261.