Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/2988265#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2012".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 2988265.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0024-3892.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "VP-Ellipsis is not licensed by VP-Topicalization".
- aggregation abstract "Starting from the observation that the constraints on VP-ellipsis (VPE) closely match those on VP-topicalization (VPT), Johnson (2001) proposes a movement account for VPE: in order for a VP to be deleted, it must first undergo topicalization. We show that although this proposal is attractive, making VPE dependent on VPT is problematic because VPE and VPT are not distributionally equivalent. While VPT targets the left periphery and consequently is subject to constraints on movement, VPE is not so restricted. We outline some alternatives for capturing the observed parallelism in the licensing of VPT and VPE.".
- aggregation authorList BK977999.
- aggregation endPage "614".
- aggregation issue "4".
- aggregation startPage "591".
- aggregation volume "34".
- aggregation aggregates 4107505.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 2988265.
- aggregation similarTo LU-2988265.