Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/2999532#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 2999532.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1353-3452.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "The epistemic integrity of scientific research".
- aggregation abstract "We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital. This concern is, however, hollow if we do not have a clear account of research integrity. Therefore, it is important that we explicate this concept. Following Rudolf Carnap's characterization of the task of explication, this means that we should develop a concept that is (1) similar to our common sense notion of research integrity, (2) exact, (3) fruitful, and (4) as simple as possible. Since existing concepts do not meet these four requirements, we develop a new concept in this article. We describe a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argue that this concept does meet Carnap's four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support our claims we use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research.".
- aggregation authorList BK673090.
- aggregation endPage "774".
- aggregation issue "3".
- aggregation startPage "757".
- aggregation volume "19".
- aggregation aggregates 2999535.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 2999532.
- aggregation similarTo s11948-012-9394-3.
- aggregation similarTo LU-2999532.