Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3037127#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "C3".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2012".
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 3037127.yaml.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Patient and therapist characteristics in psychoanalytic single case studies published in ISI-ranked journals: a review".
- aggregation abstract "Aim: Single case studies are quintessential for psychoanalytic theory, research and practice. At this moment, however, the field of single case research deals with a lack of surveyability, which hampers the full exploitation of its potential. This article reviews patient and therapist characteristics in clinical and empirical single case studies on psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapies that were published in ISI-ranked journals. Methods: Case studies were selected if they were either (1) the focus of the publication or (2) illustrative accounts of sufficient size (more than 50% of the publication or longer than 5 pages). Basic information on the patient (age, gender, diagnosis...) and the therapist (age, gender, education, theoretical background...) was systematically screened by means of the Inventory for Basic Information in Single Cases (IBISC). Results: Four hundred and sixty-five single case reports met inclusion criteria. The review revealed a rich set of clinical descriptions, in particular with respect to subjective experiences of patient and therapist. Objective characteristics were adequately reported in most cases for patients but not for therapists. A summary of the results of the IBISC screening is presented. Special attention is paid to an overview of sets of single cases according to the main diagnostic categories. Surprisingly, however, authors usually don’t mention the diagnostic system they use. Discussion: This review proves that accumulation of research findings across single cases is feasible for the major diagnostic categories. Guidelines proposing a more systematic use of diagnostic systems are provided.".
- aggregation authorList BK297787.
- aggregation endPage "48".
- aggregation startPage "48".
- aggregation isDescribedBy 3037127.
- aggregation similarTo LU-3037127.