Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3095241#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "B2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2012".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 3095241.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9789992673935.
- aggregation language "spa".
- aggregation publisher "Editorial Casa San Ignacio".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Law and Political Science".
- aggregation title "Cláusulas autónomas subordinadas e incorporadas de igualdad y no discriminacón en el sistema inteamericano".
- aggregation abstract "The principle of equality and non-discrimination is firmly recognized in the Inter-American Human Rights System (IAS) and has been invoked repeatedly by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. However, there is an application and interpretation somewhat confusing of the clauses enshrining this principle. The lack of clarity brings difficulties to assess the scope and meaning of each of the non-discrimination clauses, which in turn makes problematic the litigation of victims and States before the Court. This article aims to shed some light on this complex picture, suggesting a classification of non-discrimination clauses in three groups: autonomous, subordinate and incorporated. Additionally, this work indicates that while the categories of discrimination listed in the IAS instruments are not exhaustive, the inclusion of new categories does not rest solely on the discretion of the Court, but the regional consensus reached among States must have an important weight.".
- aggregation authorList BK1448304.
- aggregation endPage "218".
- aggregation startPage "175".
- aggregation aggregates 3095266.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 3095241.
- aggregation similarTo LU-3095241.