Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3182335#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B512298.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 3182335.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0022-2267.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "The architecture of it clefts".
- aggregation abstract "This paper examines quasi-monoclausal left-peripheral analyses of English it-clefts. Though attractive because such analyses bring out commonalities between it-clefts on the one hand and focus fronting and wh-questions on the other, the range of word order variations available in English it-clefts reveals that such monoclausal analyses of it-clefts lead to considerable complications of implementation, ultimately undoing the gain in terms of economy that initially would seem to justify them. In particular, we will show that on closer inspection the presumed focus fronting in it-clefts cannot be targeting the position deployed for ‘regular’ left-peripheral focus fronting. Moreover, both implementations of the monoclausal analysis discussed make the wrong predictions with respect to the distribution of it-clefts. In particular, as already argued by Hooper and Thompson (1973) and Emonds (1976), English it-clefting, unlike ‘regular’ focus fronting , is not a main clause phenomenon. Given these objections, we conclude that the left-peripheral analyses of it-clefts are ill-founded.".
- aggregation authorList BK859182.
- aggregation endPage "296".
- aggregation issue "2".
- aggregation startPage "269".
- aggregation volume "50".
- aggregation aggregates 3182396.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 3182335.
- aggregation similarTo S0022226713000042.
- aggregation similarTo LU-3182335.