Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3191054#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "text/html".
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 3191054.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0093-5301.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Business and Economics".
- aggregation title "Are all units created equal? The effect of default units on product evaluations".
- aggregation abstract "Previous research on attribute framing has shown that people often infer higher quantity from larger numbers, usually with the assumption that the units used to specify this information elicit the same meanings. Drawing on literature on categorization and numerical cognition, the authors challenge this assumption and show that consumers often have preset units for attribute levels that strike an optimal balance between a preference for small numbers and the need for accuracy (study 1a). As such, these default units appear commonly (study 1b). Specifying positive attributes in default units renders products' evaluation more favorable, even if such specification lowers the nominal value of the attributes (studies 2-4). This effect disappears if participants attribute metacognitive feelings generated by default units to an irrelevant source (study 3). Study 5 shows that a default unit effect is more likely in single evaluation mode, but a numerosity effect may reemerge in joint evaluations.".
- aggregation authorList BK1036351.
- aggregation endPage "1289".
- aggregation issue "6".
- aggregation startPage "1275".
- aggregation volume "39".
- aggregation aggregates 3191058.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 3191054.
- aggregation similarTo 668533.
- aggregation similarTo LU-3191054.