Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/406260#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "P1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2006".
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 406260.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9789086860081.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "Wageningen Academic Publishers".
- aggregation subject "Agriculture and Food Sciences".
- aggregation title "Consumer perception about ethical and sustainability issues of fish".
- aggregation abstract "Ethical and sustainability issues in livestock production are of increasing public importance. Till now, little profound consumer research has been conducted to reveal consumers' perception about ethics and sustainability from fisheries and aquaculture. Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of 381 Belgian women aged 25-50 years in June 2005 through a postal self-administered survey. Interest in sustainability issues was measured as the importance attached to the depletion of natural fish stocks and the environment. Also perceived importance of fish welfare was included. Finally, perception of farmed versus wild fish was measured. Consumers express higher interest in environmental issues compared to fish welfare when buying fish, meaning a higher concern about a healthy world (in favour of their own health) instead of fish welfare. Analyses also indicate a clear interest and concern in sustainability issues relating to aquaculture and fisheries, while consumers' knowledge appeared rather limited. Ten percent of the respondents claims to refuse farmed fish. A similar amount claims to refuse wild fish. The latter attach more importance to fish welfare and sustainability and are more convinced that aquaculture contributes to natural fish stock conservation. Hence, rejecting wild fish is associated with attaching importance to sustainability and fish welfare. Consumers rejecting farmed fish show no different interest in these matters as compared to those accepting it. Higher importance attached to ethical and sustainability issues correlates with a stronger interest in capture area and origin, and a stronger benefit expectation of more information, but it does neither result in a different total fish consumption frequency nor attitude towards eating fish. Higher interest in sustainability associates with lower consumption of cod. Apparently, consumers have some awareness of the challenge facing cod fisheries concerning the depletion of natural cod stocks.".
- aggregation authorList BK266182.
- aggregation endPage "469".
- aggregation startPage "464".
- aggregation isDescribedBy 406260.
- aggregation similarTo LU-406260.