Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4151877#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "B2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2012".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 4151877.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9789027202666.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "John Benjamins Publishing".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Detecting inherent bias in lexical decision experiments with the LD1NN algorithm".
- aggregation abstract "A basic assumption of the lexical decision task is that a correct response to a word requires access to a corresponding mental representation of that word. However, systematic patterns of similarities and differences between words and nonwords can lead to an inherent bias for a particular response to a given stimulus. In this paper we introduce LD1NN, a simple algorithm based on one- nearest-neighbor classification that predicts the probability of a word response for each stimulus in an experiment by looking at the word/nonword probabilities of the most similar previously presented stimuli. Then, we apply LD1NN to the task of detecting differences between a set of words and different sets of matched nonwords. Finally, we show that the LD1NN word response probabilities are predictive of response times in three large lexical decision studies and that pre- dicted biases for and against word responses corresponds with respectively faster and slower responses to words in the three studies.".
- aggregation authorList BK1424838.
- aggregation endPage "248".
- aggregation startPage "231".
- aggregation aggregates 4151878.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 4151877.
- aggregation similarTo LU-4151877.