Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4195653#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 4195653.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0924-5057.
- aggregation language "dut".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Law and Political Science".
- aggregation title "Noot bij Nr. 28 Vzr. Rb. Amsterdam 4 december 2012, A/B (belaging via internet)".
- aggregation abstract "family case in summary proceedings with a Dutch court, dealing with complaints about threatening and defamatory remarks online on several social media. The plaintiff asked for a judicial recognition of the unlawfullness of the remarks and an effective order to take down the whole accounts online, which includes approval to use the judgement to remedy any failures by the defendant to execute the order. Information society services as Facebook and Google might require such judicial acknowledgement against an account holder (defendant). I identify two legal issues as critical points of a measurement of proportionality and application of the criminal law notion of ultimum remedium involving harassment in this context. The freedom of expression jurisprudence is consistent in providing a broad approach towards means of communication and suggests to always refrain from unnecessarily cutting off essential networks of expression vis-à-vis use of social media. Comparing with Dutch criminal law on beleaguering, the second argument in this annotation is that a necessary reaction to the victim's complaints could involve an order to cancel social media accounts as a whole backed-up by a civil penalty. When harassment involves the use of social media and internet, which implies a direct confrontation for the victim, such measures would put constraints that require a careful approach to the amount of publicity and damages involved.".
- aggregation authorList BK923822.
- aggregation endPage "283".
- aggregation issue "11-12".
- aggregation startPage "280".
- aggregation volume "25".
- aggregation aggregates 4195827.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 4195653.
- aggregation similarTo LU-4195653.