Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4209807#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B832014.
- aggregation creator B832015.
- aggregation creator B832016.
- aggregation creator B832017.
- aggregation creator B832018.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 4209807.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0021-9010.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance".
- aggregation abstract "Considerable evidence suggests that how candidates react to selection procedures can affect their test performance and their attitudes toward the hiring organization (e.g., recommending the firm to others). However, very few studies of candidate reactions have examined one of the outcomes organizations care most about: job performance. We attempt to address this gap by developing and testing a conceptual framework that delineates whether and how candidate reactions might influence job performance. We accomplish this objective using data from 4 studies (total N = 6,480), 6 selection procedures (personality tests, job knowledge tests, cognitive ability tests, work samples, situational judgment tests, and a selection inventory), 5 key candidate reactions (anxiety, motivation, belief in tests, self-efficacy, and procedural justice), 2 contexts (industry and education), 3 continents (North America, South America, and Europe), 2 study designs (predictive and concurrent), and 4 occupational areas (medical, sales, customer service, and technological). Consistent with previous research, candidate reactions were related to test scores, and test scores were related to job performance. Further, there was some evidence that reactions affected performance indirectly through their influence on test scores. Finally, in no cases did candidate reactions affect the prediction of job performance by increasing or decreasing the criterion-related validity of test scores. Implications of these findings and avenues for future research are discussed.".
- aggregation authorList BK1205897.
- aggregation endPage "719".
- aggregation issue "5".
- aggregation startPage "701".
- aggregation volume "98".
- aggregation aggregates 4209889.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 4209807.
- aggregation similarTo a0034089.
- aggregation similarTo LU-4209807.