Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4400811#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 4400811.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1550-1329.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Technology and Engineering".
- aggregation title "Broadcast aggregation to improve quality of service in wireless sensor networks".
- aggregation abstract "In-network aggregation is used in wireless sensor networks to reduce energy consumption on sensor nodes with limited capabilities. Typically, only packets with the same destination are aggregated along the routing path and these packets are sent by unicast. While this is adequate for traditional multipoint-to-point sensor network applications, this is not suitable when wireless sensor nodes are connected in a full mesh topology, as is the case in the Internet of Things. In these full mesh topologies, queues will be filled with packets with many different destinations, which limits the aggregation possibilities. Furthermore, the Quality of Service level will decrease since packets have to wait longer to find aggregation candidates. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to use broadcast aggregation that can aggregate packets independent of their destination. Broadcast aggregation is analyzed through simulations against unicast aggregation and no aggregation. Results show that energy can be reduced up to 13% compared with unicast aggregation and up to 27% compared with no aggregation. In terms of reliability, the Quality of Service is improved up to 15% compared with unicast aggregation and up to 23% compared with no aggregation. The delay on its turn is decreased by 52% compared with unicast aggregation.".
- aggregation authorList BK1251619.
- aggregation aggregates 4400829.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 4400811.
- aggregation similarTo 383678.
- aggregation similarTo LU-4400811.