Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4415776#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 36 of
36
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B910523.
- aggregation creator B910524.
- aggregation creator B910525.
- aggregation creator B910526.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 4415776.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1360-7863.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Validation of the FFM PD count technique for screening personality pathology in later middle-aged and older adults".
- aggregation abstract "Research on the applicability of the five factor model (FFM) to capture personality pathology coincided with the development of a FFM personality disorder (PD) count technique, which has been validated in adolescent, young, and middle-aged samples. This study extends the literature by validating this technique in an older sample. Five alternative FFM PD counts based upon the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) are computed and evaluated in terms of both convergent and divergent validity with the Assessment of DSM-IV Personality Disorders Questionnaire (shortly ADP-IV; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fourth edition). For the best working count for each PD normative data are presented, from which cut-off scores are derived. The validity of these cut-offs and their usefulness as a screening tool is tested against both a categorical (i.e., the DSM-IV – Text Revision), and a dimensional (i.e., the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology; DAPP) measure of personality pathology. All but the Antisocial and Obsessive-Compulsive counts exhibited adequate convergent and divergent validity, supporting the use of this method in older adults. Using the ADP-IV and the DAPP – Short Form as validation criteria, results corroborate the use of the FFM PD count technique to screen for PDs in older adults, in particular for the Paranoid, Borderline, Histrionic, Avoidant, and Dependent PDs. Given the age-neutrality of the NEO PI-R and the considerable lack of valid personality assessment tools, current findings appear to be promising for the assessment of pathology in older adults.".
- aggregation authorList BK1290540.
- aggregation endPage "188".
- aggregation issue "2".
- aggregation startPage "180".
- aggregation volume "17".
- aggregation aggregates 5817280.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 4415776.
- aggregation similarTo 13607863.2012.717258.
- aggregation similarTo LU-4415776.