Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5659034#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 5659034.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1018-2101.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "'You didn’t build that': a relevance-theoretic approach to President Obama's campaign flub".
- aggregation abstract "During the 2012 U.S. Presidential campaign, President Obama turned some heads by stating “If you’ve got a business – you didn’t build that”. His opponents argued that this was an attack on private enterprise (with “that” referring to business), while his supporters and fact-checking organizations maintained that “that” referred to what Obama was talking about previously (U.S. infrastructure) and represented his political-economic plan of an increased interlacing of private business with government investment. I argue, from a relevance-theoretic perspective, that both interpretations follow from differing contextual assumptions on the part of the audience. In this sense, the role of contextual assumptions in utterance interpretation is highlighted – different contextual assumptions lead to different cognitive effects if the utterance leaves room for more than one interpretation. Combined with a highly polarized U.S. political arena, where participants pounce on their opponent’s every possible miscue, all the ingredients for misunderstanding are present.".
- aggregation authorList BK1333922.
- aggregation endPage "838".
- aggregation issue "4".
- aggregation startPage "819".
- aggregation volume "24".
- aggregation aggregates 5846725.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 5659034.
- aggregation similarTo LU-5659034.