Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5764931#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "B2".
- aggregation creator B995059.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 5764931.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9789027203861.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "John Benjamins".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "Against the matrix left peripheral analysis of English it-clefts".
- aggregation abstract "In the wake of the proposals for the articulated left periphery (Rizzi 1997), Meinunger (1997, 1998), Frascarelli & Ramaglia (2009, 2013) and Sleeman (2011) privilege the interpretive similarities of English it-clefts with monoclausal sentences with a preposed focus or with a fronted wh-phrase. They hence assign to it-clefts a representation modeled on that of wh-interrogatives and of focus fronting . The paper first outlines one precise cartographic implementation of this analysis and then it is shown that such an analysis presents a number of problems of implementation which proponents of the matrix analysis would have to address. The problems concern both the external and the internal syntax of it-clefts. Distributionally, it-clefts are shown to pattern differently from sentences with focus fronting. Moreover the monoclausal analysis raises problems of implementation, in particular given that the cleft focus can itself undergo focus fronting and wh-movement.".
- aggregation authorList BK1400138.
- aggregation endPage "107".
- aggregation startPage "91".
- aggregation aggregates 5787628.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 5764931.
- aggregation similarTo LU-5764931.