Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5811161#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B927794.
- aggregation creator B927795.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2013".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 5811161.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1472-684X.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Medicine and Health Sciences".
- aggregation title "Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study".
- aggregation abstract "Background: In recent years, there have been several studies, using a wide variety of methods, aimed at developing quality indicators for palliative care. In this Quality Indicators for Palliative Care study (Q-PAC study) we have applied a scientifically rigorous method to develop a comprehensive and valid quality indicator set which can contribute to a standardized method for use in other countries. Methods and design: Firstly, an extensive literature review identified existing international quality indicators and relevant themes for measuring quality in palliative care. Secondly, the most relevant of these were selected by an expert panel. Thirdly, those prioritized by the experts were scored by a second multidisciplinary expert panel for usability and relevance, in keeping with the RAND/UCLA-method, combining evidence with consensus among stakeholders. This panel included carers and policymakers as well as patients and next-of-kin. Fourthly, the draft set was tested and evaluated in practice for usability and feasibility; the indicators were then translated into questionnaires presented to patients, next-of-kin and care providers. To encourage the acceptance and use of the indicators, stakeholders, including national palliative care organizations, were involved throughout the whole project. Conclusion: Our indicator development trajectory resulted in a set of quality indicators applicable to all patients in all palliative care settings. The set includes patient and relative perspectives and includes outcome, process and structure indicators. Our method can contribute internationally to a more standardized and rigorous approach to developing quality indicators for palliative care.".
- aggregation authorList BK1310865.
- aggregation volume "12".
- aggregation aggregates 5811170.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 5811161.
- aggregation similarTo 147-684X-12-6.
- aggregation similarTo LU-5811161.