Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5832982#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 5832982.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1660-4601.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Agriculture and Food Sciences".
- aggregation title "Evaluation of three swabbing devices for detection of Listeria monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces".
- aggregation abstract "Listeria monocytogenes can adhere to different types of food contact surfaces within a food processing environment. Therefore, environmental sampling devices should be capable of detecting unacceptable contamination. In this study, a sponge-stick, foam spatula and an environmental swab were evaluated on their ability to detect low concentrations of L. monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces. A cocktail of four L. monocytogenes serotypes was inoculated with a concentration of 100 CFU/250 cm(2) onto stainless steel (SS), high density polyethylene (HDPE) and rubber surfaces in a 250 cm(2) area. Immediately after inoculation and after 1 h exposure, the surfaces were swabbed with the different swabbing devices. The results of the study show only minor differences in the ability of the swabbing devices to detect L. monocytogenes. All devices were capable to detect the contamination immediately after inoculation. However, when the surfaces were allowed to air-dry for 1 h, L. monocytogenes was undetected in 11.1% of the samples (n = 27) with the sponge stick, in 7.4% of the samples (n = 27) with the foam spatula and in 3.7% of the samples (n = 27) with the environmental swab, especially on SS surfaces. The detection ability of the different devices for L. monocytogenes can be concluded to be rather high on different types of food contact surfaces.".
- aggregation authorList BK1427420.
- aggregation endPage "814".
- aggregation issue "1".
- aggregation startPage "804".
- aggregation volume "11".
- aggregation aggregates 5833247.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 5832982.
- aggregation similarTo ijerph110100804.
- aggregation similarTo LU-5832982.