Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5876526#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2015".
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 5876526.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:2295-5836.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "Incommensurable Aims in the Philosophy of Art".
- aggregation abstract "This article argues that philosophers of art wrongly aim for their definitions of art to be both descriptively and normatively adequate, for the method that is used to achieve both aims, namely the method of reflective equilibrium, is not applicable to the project of defining art. Therefore, in order to facilitate genuine debate regarding definitions of art, philosophers must abandon the method of reflective equilibrium and determine which approach, be it descriptive or normative, deems more appropriate.".
- aggregation authorList BK1318413.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 5876526.
- aggregation similarTo LU-5876526.