Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/628840#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B286262.
- aggregation creator B286263.
- aggregation creator B286264.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2009".
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 628840.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0022-0663.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1939-2176.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "American Psychological Association".
- aggregation rights "I don't know the status of the copyright for this publication".
- aggregation title "Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters.".
- aggregation abstract "The present research complements extant variable-centered research that focused on the dimensions of autonomous and controlled motivation through adoption of a person-centered approach for identifying motivational profiles. Both in high school students (Study 1) and college students (Study 2), a cluster analysis revealed 4 motivational profiles: a good quality motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, low controlled); a poor quality motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, high controlled); a low quantity motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, low controlled); and a high quantity motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, high controlled). To compare the 4 groups, the authors derived predictions from qualitative and quantitative perspectives on motivation. Findings generally favored the qualitative perspective; compared with the other groups, the good quality motivation group displayed the most optimal learning pattern and scored highest on perceived need-supportive teaching. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.".
- aggregation authorList BK568490.
- aggregation endPage "688".
- aggregation issue "3".
- aggregation startPage "671".
- aggregation volume "101".
- aggregation isDescribedBy 628840.
- aggregation similarTo a0015083.
- aggregation similarTo LU-628840.