Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/686764#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "P1".
- aggregation creator B62817.
- aggregation creator B62818.
- aggregation creator B62819.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2008".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 686764.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9781586039233.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0922-6389.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "IOS Press".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Science General".
- aggregation title "Introducing realist ontology for the representation of adverse events".
- aggregation abstract "The goal of the REMINE project is to build a high performance prediction, detection and monitoring platform for managing Risks against Patient Safety (RAPS). Part of the work involves developing in ontology enabling computer-assisted RAPS decision support on the basis of the disease history of a patient as documented in a hospital information system. A requirement of the ontology is to contain a representation for what is commonly referred to by the term 'adverse event', one challenge being that distinct authoritative sources define this term in different and context-dependent ways. The presence of some common ground in all definitions is, however, obvious. Using the analytical principles underlying Basic Formal Ontology and Referent Tracking, both developed in the tradition of philosophical realism, we propose a formal representation of this common ground which combines a reference ontology consisting exclusively of representations of universals and an application ontology which consists representations of defined classes. We argue that what in most cases is referred to by means of the term 'adverse event' - when used generically - is a defined class rather than a universal. In favour of the conception of adverse events as forming a defined class are the arguments that (1) there is no definition for 'adverse event' that carves out a collection of particulars which constitutes the extension of a universal, and (2) the majority of definitions require adverse events to be (variably) the result of some observation, assessment or (absence of) expectation, thereby giving these entities a nominal or epistemological flavour.".
- aggregation authorList BK159765.
- aggregation endPage "250".
- aggregation startPage "237".
- aggregation volume "183".
- aggregation aggregates 701581.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 686764.
- aggregation similarTo LU-686764.