Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/742159#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2009".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 742159.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0168-647X.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "De Gruyter".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "The rise of ergativity in Hindi: assessing the role of grammaticalization".
- aggregation abstract "This article investigates the origins and development of the ergative patterning in Hindi. Following traditional Indo-Aryan scholarship, two evolutions are discerned: (i) the reanalysis of a passive as an ergative construction, and (ii) the development of an ergative case marker ne. Three different hypotheses have been postulated in the literature to account for the latter change, two of which suggest a grammaticalization path: the first argues for a case marker as a possible source, the second points towards a lexical source. The third hypothesis maintains that language contact is involved in the change. We scrutinize all three hypotheses and conclude that the ne-clitic is borrowed from Old Rajasthani and introduced in analogy to other clitics, which were already in use as reinforcers of existing case functions. We argue furthermore that the rise of the ergative marker can only be adequately explained in relation to the constructional change in (i). Drawing on the traditional account which traces the origins of the ergative construction back to a former passive construction through reanalysis, we argue that it was actually this constructional reanalysis that allowed the introduction of an ergative marker in the language.".
- aggregation authorList BK578455.
- aggregation endPage "389".
- aggregation issue "1".
- aggregation startPage "367".
- aggregation volume "30".
- aggregation aggregates 1132381.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 742159.
- aggregation similarTo flih.2009.004.
- aggregation similarTo LU-742159.