Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/747546#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B376092.
- aggregation creator B376093.
- aggregation creator B376094.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2008".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 747546.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0090-502X.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation title "Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading".
- aggregation abstract "Syntactically ambiguous sentences are sometimes read faster than disambiguated strings. Models of parsing have explained this tendency by appealing either to a race in the construction of alternative structures or to reanalysis. However, it is also possible that readers of ambiguous sentences save time by strategically underspecifying interpretations of ambiguous attachments. In a self-paced reading study, participants viewed sentences with relative clauses that could attach to one of two sites. Type of question was also manipulated between participants in order to test whether goals can influence reading/parsing strategies. The experiment revealed an ambiguity advantage in reading times, but only when participants expected superficial comprehension questions. When participants expected queries about relative clause interpretation, disambiguating regions were inspected with more care, and the ambiguity advantage was attenuated. However, even when participants expected relative clause queries, question-answering times suggested underspecified representations of ambiguous relative clause attachments. The results support the construal and "good-enough" models of parsing.".
- aggregation authorList BK679173.
- aggregation endPage "216".
- aggregation issue "1".
- aggregation startPage "201".
- aggregation volume "36".
- aggregation aggregates 826127.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 747546.
- aggregation similarTo MC.36.1.201.
- aggregation similarTo LU-747546.