Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Adversary_evaluation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 items per page.
- Adversary_evaluation abstract "According to Alkin and Christie, an adversary approach is one which reflects a valuing orientation. This approach developed in response to the dominant objectifying approaches in policy evaluation and is based on the notions that: 1) no evaluator can be truly objective, and, 2) no evaluation can be value-free. To this end, the approach makes use of teams of evaluators who present two opposing views (these teams are commonly referred to as adversaries and advocates). These two sides then agree on issues to address, collect data or evidence which forms a common database, and present their arguments. A neutral party is assigned to referee the hearing, and is expected to arrive at a fair verdict after consideration of all the evidence presented.There are many different models for adversary evaluations, including judicial, congressional hearing and debate models. However, models which subscribe to a legal-framework are most prominent in the literature.".
- Adversary_evaluation wikiPageID "33172534".
- Adversary_evaluation wikiPageRevisionID "562039270".
- Adversary_evaluation hasPhotoCollection Adversary_evaluation.
- Adversary_evaluation subject Category:Evaluation_methods.
- Adversary_evaluation type Ability105616246.
- Adversary_evaluation type Abstraction100002137.
- Adversary_evaluation type Cognition100023271.
- Adversary_evaluation type EvaluationMethods.
- Adversary_evaluation type Know-how105616786.
- Adversary_evaluation type Method105660268.
- Adversary_evaluation type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Adversary_evaluation comment "According to Alkin and Christie, an adversary approach is one which reflects a valuing orientation. This approach developed in response to the dominant objectifying approaches in policy evaluation and is based on the notions that: 1) no evaluator can be truly objective, and, 2) no evaluation can be value-free. To this end, the approach makes use of teams of evaluators who present two opposing views (these teams are commonly referred to as adversaries and advocates).".
- Adversary_evaluation label "Adversary evaluation".
- Adversary_evaluation sameAs m.0h67f3f.
- Adversary_evaluation sameAs Q4686703.
- Adversary_evaluation sameAs Q4686703.
- Adversary_evaluation sameAs Adversary_evaluation.
- Adversary_evaluation wasDerivedFrom Adversary_evaluation?oldid=562039270.
- Adversary_evaluation isPrimaryTopicOf Adversary_evaluation.