Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 15 of
15
with 100 items per page.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens abstract "In Automotive Tooling Systems (Pty) Ltd v Wilkens & others, an important case in South African labour law, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) confirmed the principle that a restraint will be considered to be unreasonable and therefore contrary to public policy, and therefore unenforceable, if it does not protect some legally recognisable interest of the employer but merely seeks to exclude or eliminate competition.The court further pointed out that the dividing line between the use by an employee of his own skill, knowledge and experience, which he cannot be restrained from using, and the use of his employer's trade secrets or confidential information or other interest, which he may not disclose if bound by a restraint, is often very difficult to define. What must be clear, according to the court, is that the interest is one that might properly be described as belonging to the employer rather than to the employee, and in that sense "proprietary to the employer."".
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens wikiPageID "38821316".
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens wikiPageRevisionID "604264226".
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens hasPhotoCollection Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens subject Category:2007_in_South_Africa.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens subject Category:2007_in_case_law.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens subject Category:South_African_labour_case_law.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Appeal_of_South_Africa_cases.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens comment "In Automotive Tooling Systems (Pty) Ltd v Wilkens & others, an important case in South African labour law, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) confirmed the principle that a restraint will be considered to be unreasonable and therefore contrary to public policy, and therefore unenforceable, if it does not protect some legally recognisable interest of the employer but merely seeks to exclude or eliminate competition.The court further pointed out that the dividing line between the use by an employee of his own skill, knowledge and experience, which he cannot be restrained from using, and the use of his employer's trade secrets or confidential information or other interest, which he may not disclose if bound by a restraint, is often very difficult to define. ".
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens label "Automotive Tooling Systems v Wilkens".
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens sameAs m.0rpj6nz.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens sameAs Q16826358.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens sameAs Q16826358.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens wasDerivedFrom Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens?oldid=604264226.
- Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens isPrimaryTopicOf Automotive_Tooling_Systems_v_Wilkens.