Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 items per page.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna abstract "Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning contract law and arbitration. The case arose from a class action filed in Florida against a payday lender alleging the loan agreements the plaintiffs had signed were unenforceable because they essentially charged a higher interest rate than that permitted under Florida law.The lending agreements called for all disputes between the borrower and lender to be settled in arbitration. The original plaintiffs argued that the entire contract, including the arbitration clause, was invalid because it violated the law. When it was appealed to the High Court, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a majority of seven that the Federal Arbitration Act, as previously interpreted by the Court, settled a question that had long been debated by legal scholars and lower-court judges. The opinion distinguished void and voidable contracts, requiring that in the latter an arbitrator rule on all issues including the legality of the contract unless the arbitration clause was itself challenged. The only dissenter was Clarence Thomas, who restated his belief that the Arbitration Act does not supersede state law.".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna wikiPageID "19137022".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna wikiPageRevisionID "603745921".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna arguedate "--11-29".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna argueyear "2005".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna citation "126".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna decidedate "--02-21".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna decideyear "2006".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna dissent "Thomas".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna fullname "Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., petitioner v. John Cardegna et al.".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna hasPhotoCollection Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna holding "Where contract contains arbitration clause, arbitrator alone can rule on legality of contract under state law in first instance unless clause itself is challenged, distinguishing between void and voidable. Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna joinmajority "Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Roberts, Souter, Stevens".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna lawsapplied "Federal Arbitration Act,".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna litigants "Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna majority "Scalia".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna notparticipating "Alito".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna prior "172800.0".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna scotus "2006".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna uspage "440".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna usvol "546".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:2006_in_United_States_case_law.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:United_States_arbitration_case_law.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:United_States_banking_case_law.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna subject Category:United_States_class_action_case_law.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type AdministrativeDistrict108491826.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Country108544813.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type District108552138.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Location100027167.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Object100002684.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Region108630985.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type UnitedStatesBankingCaseLaw.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type YagoGeoEntity.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Case.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type LegalCase.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type UnitOfWork.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Event.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna type Situation.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna comment "Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning contract law and arbitration. The case arose from a class action filed in Florida against a payday lender alleging the loan agreements the plaintiffs had signed were unenforceable because they essentially charged a higher interest rate than that permitted under Florida law.The lending agreements called for all disputes between the borrower and lender to be settled in arbitration.".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna label "Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna".
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna sameAs m.04j9z4v.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna sameAs Q4983065.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna sameAs Q4983065.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna sameAs Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna wasDerivedFrom Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna?oldid=603745921.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna isPrimaryTopicOf Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna.
- Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna name "Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., petitioner v. John Cardegna et al.".