Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California abstract "Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine justices unanimously agreed that this basis for personal jurisdiction—known as "transient jurisdiction"—is constitutionally permissible. However, the Court was sharply divided on the reasons for the decision, reflecting two fundamentally different approaches to how due-process issues are to be analyzed, and there was no majority opinion. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the lead opinion, joined in whole or part by three other Justices. Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. wrote an opinion also joined by three other Justices. Justices Byron R. White and John Paul Stevens wrote separate opinions.".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wikiPageExternalLink Burnham_Case.pdf.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wikiPageExternalLink burnham-superior-court.html.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wikiPageExternalLink 1989_89_44.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wikiPageID "20033977".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wikiPageRevisionID "573393762".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California arguedate "--02-28".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California argueyear "1990".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California citation "17280.0".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California concurrence "Brennan".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California concurrence "Stevens".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California concurrence "White".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California decidedate "--05-29".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California decideyear "1990".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California fullname "Dennis Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California hasPhotoCollection Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California holding "Personal jurisdiction can be exercised over a nonresident who was personally served with process while temporarily in that State, in a suit unrelated to his activities in the State.".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California joinconcurrence "Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California joinplurality "Rehnquist, Kennedy; White".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California lawsapplied "U.S. Const. Amend. XIV".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California litigants "Burnham v. Superior Court of California".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California plurality "Scalia".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California scotus "1988".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California uspage "604".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California usvol "495".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California subject Category:1990_in_California.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California subject Category:1990_in_United_States_case_law.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California subject Category:Legal_history_of_California.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type Case.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type LegalCase.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type UnitOfWork.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type Event.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California type Situation.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California comment "Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine justices unanimously agreed that this basis for personal jurisdiction—known as "transient jurisdiction"—is constitutionally permissible.".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California label "Burnham v. Superior Court of California".
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California sameAs m.04yhhl9.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California sameAs Q4999762.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California sameAs Q4999762.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California wasDerivedFrom Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California?oldid=573393762.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California isPrimaryTopicOf Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California.
- Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California name "Dennis Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin".