Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC abstract "Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC (1977), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 141 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the legislative jurisdiction of cable television. Chief Justice Laskin, writing for the majority of the Court, held that all television, even where exclusively produced and distributed within the province, fell within the definition of a federal undertaking under section 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867. Rogers Cable provided a subscription service for American television programs. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), a federal regulatory agency, required television broadcasters such as Rogers to remove the commercials from American television feeds and replace them with Canadian ads.The issue before the Court was whether the federal government had legislative jurisdiction over the content of cable television.Laskin held that both cable and broadcast television were both within the jurisdiction of the federal government.This decision was released along with the accompanying case Dionne v. Quebec (Public Service Board) [1978] 2 S.C.R. 191.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC wikiPageExternalLink 1978rcs2-141.html.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC wikiPageExternalLink 1977canlii12.html.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC wikiPageID "4643065".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC wikiPageRevisionID "516384184".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC caseName "Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC citations "[1978] 2 S.C.R. 141".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC decidedDate "1977-11-30".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC dissent "Pigeon J.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC hasPhotoCollection Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC heardDate "--01-26".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC history "Appeal from Federal Court of Appeal".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC joindissent "Beetz and de Grandpré JJ.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC joinmajority "Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence and Dickson JJ.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC majority "Laskin C.J.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC scc "1977".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:1977_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:Canadian_Radio-television_and_Telecommunications_Commission.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:Canadian_federalism_case_law.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:Canadian_media_regulation.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:Rogers_Communications.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC comment "Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC (1977), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 141 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the legislative jurisdiction of cable television. Chief Justice Laskin, writing for the majority of the Court, held that all television, even where exclusively produced and distributed within the province, fell within the definition of a federal undertaking under section 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867. Rogers Cable provided a subscription service for American television programs.".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC label "Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC".
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC sameAs m.0cf4xq.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC sameAs Q5035507.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC sameAs Q5035507.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC wasDerivedFrom Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC?oldid=516384184.
- Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC isPrimaryTopicOf Capital_Cities_Communications_v._CRTC.