Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cooper_v._Hobart> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- Cooper_v._Hobart abstract "Cooper v. Hobart, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537, 2001 SCC 79, is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the Anns test, which was adopted in Kamloops v. Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases.".
- Cooper_v._Hobart wikiPageID "2779883".
- Cooper_v._Hobart wikiPageRevisionID "549577649".
- Cooper_v._Hobart caseName "Cooper v. Hobart".
- Cooper_v._Hobart citations "[2001] 3 S.C.R. 537, 2001 SCC 79".
- Cooper_v._Hobart decidedDate "2001-11-16".
- Cooper_v._Hobart docket "27880".
- Cooper_v._Hobart fullCaseName "Mary Francis Cooper v. Robert J. Hobart and Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia".
- Cooper_v._Hobart hasPhotoCollection Cooper_v._Hobart.
- Cooper_v._Hobart heardDate "2001-06-20".
- Cooper_v._Hobart notparticipating "L'Heureux-Dubé and Iacobucci JJ.".
- Cooper_v._Hobart ratio "A Registrar does not owe a duty of care to investors".
- Cooper_v._Hobart ruling "Appeal dismissed".
- Cooper_v._Hobart scc "2000".
- Cooper_v._Hobart unanimous "McLachlin C.J. and Major J.".
- Cooper_v._Hobart subject Category:2001_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Cooper_v._Hobart subject Category:Canadian_tort_case_law.
- Cooper_v._Hobart subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Cooper_v._Hobart comment "Cooper v. Hobart, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537, 2001 SCC 79, is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the Anns test, which was adopted in Kamloops v. Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases.".
- Cooper_v._Hobart label "Cooper v. Hobart".
- Cooper_v._Hobart sameAs m.0825wd.
- Cooper_v._Hobart sameAs Q5167843.
- Cooper_v._Hobart sameAs Q5167843.
- Cooper_v._Hobart wasDerivedFrom Cooper_v._Hobart?oldid=549577649.
- Cooper_v._Hobart isPrimaryTopicOf Cooper_v._Hobart.