Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cost_of_poor_quality> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 22 of
22
with 100 items per page.
- Cost_of_poor_quality abstract "Cost of poor quality (COPQ) or poor quality costs (PQC), are defined as costs that would disappear if systems, processes, and products were perfect.COPQ was popularized by IBM quality expert H. James Harrington in his 1987 book Poor Quality Costs.COPQ is a refinement of the concept of quality costs. In the 1960s, IBM undertook an effort to study its own quality costs and tailored the concept for its own use. While Feigenbaum's term "quality costs" is technically accurate, it's easy for the uninitiated to jump to the conclusion that better quality products cost more to produce. Harrington adopted the name "poor quality costs" to emphasize the belief that investment in detection and prevention of product failures is more than offset by the savings in reductions in product failures.Harrington decomposes COPQ into the following elements:".
- Cost_of_poor_quality wikiPageID "11730635".
- Cost_of_poor_quality wikiPageRevisionID "606729832".
- Cost_of_poor_quality hasPhotoCollection Cost_of_poor_quality.
- Cost_of_poor_quality subject Category:Costs.
- Cost_of_poor_quality subject Category:Economics_terminology.
- Cost_of_poor_quality subject Category:Quality_control.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Abstraction100002137.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Cost113275847.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Costs.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Outgo113275288.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Possession100032613.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type Relation100031921.
- Cost_of_poor_quality type TransferredProperty113252973.
- Cost_of_poor_quality comment "Cost of poor quality (COPQ) or poor quality costs (PQC), are defined as costs that would disappear if systems, processes, and products were perfect.COPQ was popularized by IBM quality expert H. James Harrington in his 1987 book Poor Quality Costs.COPQ is a refinement of the concept of quality costs. In the 1960s, IBM undertook an effort to study its own quality costs and tailored the concept for its own use.".
- Cost_of_poor_quality label "Cost of poor quality".
- Cost_of_poor_quality sameAs m.02rqd66.
- Cost_of_poor_quality sameAs Q5174799.
- Cost_of_poor_quality sameAs Q5174799.
- Cost_of_poor_quality sameAs Cost_of_poor_quality.
- Cost_of_poor_quality wasDerivedFrom Cost_of_poor_quality?oldid=606729832.
- Cost_of_poor_quality isPrimaryTopicOf Cost_of_poor_quality.