Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Davis_v._Washington> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- Davis_v._Washington abstract "Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that hearsay statements made in a 9-1-1 call asking for aid were not "testimonial" in nature and thus their introduction at trial did not violate the Confrontation Clause as defined in Crawford v. Washington.".
- Davis_v._Washington wikiPageExternalLink Davis_v._Washington.pdf.
- Davis_v._Washington wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Davis_v._Washington wikiPageID "7916845".
- Davis_v._Washington wikiPageRevisionID "489712430".
- Davis_v._Washington arguedate "--03-20".
- Davis_v._Washington argueyear "2006".
- Davis_v._Washington citation "172800.0".
- Davis_v._Washington dissent "Thomas".
- Davis_v._Washington decidedate "--06-19".
- Davis_v._Washington decideyear "2006".
- Davis_v._Washington docket "5".
- Davis_v._Washington fullname "Adrian Martell Davis, Petitioner v. Washington; Hershel Hammon, Petitioner v. Indiana".
- Davis_v._Washington hasPhotoCollection Davis_v._Washington.
- Davis_v._Washington holding "A 911 phone call describing an "ongoing emergency" is not testimonial in nature, and thus may be admitted at trial even if the caller is not available without violating the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause.".
- Davis_v._Washington joinmajority "Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Roberts, Alito".
- Davis_v._Washington lawsapplied "Crawford v. Washington, Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause.".
- Davis_v._Washington litigants "Davis v. Washington".
- Davis_v._Washington majority "Scalia".
- Davis_v._Washington oralargument argument.
- Davis_v._Washington prior "17280.0".
- Davis_v._Washington scotus "2006".
- Davis_v._Washington subsequent "On remand at, Remanded by Hammon v. State, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 793".
- Davis_v._Washington uspage "813".
- Davis_v._Washington usvol "547".
- Davis_v._Washington subject Category:2006_in_United_States_case_law.
- Davis_v._Washington subject Category:Confrontation_Clause_case_law.
- Davis_v._Washington subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Davis_v._Washington subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Davis_v._Washington type Case.
- Davis_v._Washington type LegalCase.
- Davis_v._Washington type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Davis_v._Washington type UnitOfWork.
- Davis_v._Washington type Event.
- Davis_v._Washington type Situation.
- Davis_v._Washington comment "Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that hearsay statements made in a 9-1-1 call asking for aid were not "testimonial" in nature and thus their introduction at trial did not violate the Confrontation Clause as defined in Crawford v. Washington.".
- Davis_v._Washington label "Davis v. Washington".
- Davis_v._Washington sameAs m.026jznl.
- Davis_v._Washington sameAs Q5242011.
- Davis_v._Washington sameAs Q5242011.
- Davis_v._Washington wasDerivedFrom Davis_v._Washington?oldid=489712430.
- Davis_v._Washington isPrimaryTopicOf Davis_v._Washington.
- Davis_v._Washington name "Adrian Martell Davis, Petitioner v. Washington; Hershel Hammon, Petitioner v. Indiana".