Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Goesaert_v._Cleary> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary abstract "Goesaert v. Cleary, 335 U.S. 464 (1948), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a Michigan law which prohibited women from being licensed as a bartender in all cities having a population of 50,000 or more, unless their father or husband owned the establishment. Valentine Goesaert, the plaintiff in this case, challenged the law on the ground that it infringed on the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Speaking for the majority, Justice Felix Frankfurter affirmed the judgment of the Detroit, Michigan district court and upheld the constitutionality of the state law. The state argued that since the profession of bartending could potentially lead to moral and social problems for women, it was within the state's power to bar them from working as bartenders. Only when the owner of the bar was a sufficiently close relative to the women bartender could it be guaranteed that such immorality would not be present. Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) subsequently overruled Goesaert.".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=335&page=464.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageExternalLink 194780974FSupp735_1617.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageID "9622517".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wikiPageRevisionID "606136684".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary arguedate "--11-19".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary argueyear "1948".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary case "Goesaert v. Cleary, 335 U.S. 464".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary citation "69".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary decidedate "--12-20".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary decideyear "1948".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary dissent "Rutledge".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary findlaw getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=335&page=464.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary fullname "Valentine Goesaert et al. v. Owen J. Cleary et al.".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary hasPhotoCollection Goesaert_v._Cleary.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary holding "A state law prohibiting a woman from being licensed as a bartender unless she was the wife or daughter of the bar owner did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary joindissent "Douglas, Murphy".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary joinmajority "Vinson, Black, Reed, Jackson, Burton".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary justia case.html.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary lawsapplied "U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Mich. Stat. Ann. § 18990.".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary leagle 194780974FSupp735_1617.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary litigants "Goesaert v. Cleary".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary majority "Frankfurter".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary overruled "Craig v. Boren".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary prior "74".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary scotus "1946".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary uspage "464".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary usvol "335".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:1948_in_United_States_case_law.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:Bartending.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:Legal_history_of_Michigan.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:Overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:United_States_Twenty-first_Amendment_case_law.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Abstraction100002137.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Act100030358.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Action100037396.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Choice100161243.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Decision100162632.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Event100029378.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type OverruledUnitedStatesSupremeCourtDecisions.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Case.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type LegalCase.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type UnitOfWork.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Event.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary type Situation.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary comment "Goesaert v. Cleary, 335 U.S. 464 (1948), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a Michigan law which prohibited women from being licensed as a bartender in all cities having a population of 50,000 or more, unless their father or husband owned the establishment. Valentine Goesaert, the plaintiff in this case, challenged the law on the ground that it infringed on the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary label "Goesaert v. Cleary".
- Goesaert_v._Cleary sameAs m.02pm4d1.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary sameAs Q5577169.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary sameAs Q5577169.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary sameAs Goesaert_v._Cleary.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary wasDerivedFrom Goesaert_v._Cleary?oldid=606136684.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary isPrimaryTopicOf Goesaert_v._Cleary.
- Goesaert_v._Cleary name "Valentine Goesaert et al. v. Owen J. Cleary et al.".