Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Grosso_v._Miramax> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 items per page.
- Grosso_v._Miramax abstract "Grosso v. Miramax, 383 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2004), was an entertainment law case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a screenwriter's claim for breach of implied contract was not preempted by United States federal copyright law, because the screenwriter's claim alleged an extra element that transformed the action from one arising under the ambit of the federal copyright statute to one sounding in contract.".
- Grosso_v._Miramax thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg?width=300.
- Grosso_v._Miramax wikiPageExternalLink B193872.PDF.
- Grosso_v._Miramax wikiPageID "11971171".
- Grosso_v._Miramax wikiPageRevisionID "484881001".
- Grosso_v._Miramax hasPhotoCollection Grosso_v._Miramax.
- Grosso_v._Miramax subject Category:2004_in_United_States_case_law.
- Grosso_v._Miramax subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases.
- Grosso_v._Miramax subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Grosso_v._Miramax subject Category:United_States_copyright_case_law.
- Grosso_v._Miramax comment "Grosso v. Miramax, 383 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2004), was an entertainment law case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a screenwriter's claim for breach of implied contract was not preempted by United States federal copyright law, because the screenwriter's claim alleged an extra element that transformed the action from one arising under the ambit of the federal copyright statute to one sounding in contract.".
- Grosso_v._Miramax label "Grosso v. Miramax".
- Grosso_v._Miramax sameAs m.02r_4cj.
- Grosso_v._Miramax sameAs Q5610612.
- Grosso_v._Miramax sameAs Q5610612.
- Grosso_v._Miramax wasDerivedFrom Grosso_v._Miramax?oldid=484881001.
- Grosso_v._Miramax depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg.
- Grosso_v._Miramax isPrimaryTopicOf Grosso_v._Miramax.