Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 47 of
47
with 100 items per page.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California abstract "Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, 113 S.Ct. 2891 (1993), was a controversial United States Supreme Court case which held that foreign companies acting in foreign countries could nevertheless be held liable for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act if they conspired to restrain trade within the United States, and succeeded in doing so.".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California wikiPageID "1735073".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California wikiPageRevisionID "580104969".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California arguedate "--02-23".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California argueyear "1993".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California citation "172800.0".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California concurrence "Souter".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California decidedate "--06-28".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California decideyear "1993".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California dissent "Scalia".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California fullname "Hartford Fire Insurance Company, et al., Petitioners 91-1111 v. California, et al.; and Merrett Underwriting Agency Management Limited, et al., Petitioners 91-1128 v. California, et al.".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California hasPhotoCollection Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California holding "The Court stated that "it is well established by now that the Sherman Act applies to foreign conduct that was meant to produce and did in fact produce some substantial effect in the United States."".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California joinconcurrence "White, Blackmun, Stevens".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California joindissent "O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California joinmajority "Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, Stevens".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California joinmajority "unanimous".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California lawsapplied Sherman_Antitrust_Act.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California litigants "Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California majority "Scalia".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California majority "Souter".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California prior "On writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California scotus "1991".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California uspage "764".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California usvol "509".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:1993_in_California.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:1993_in_United_States_case_law.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:ITT_Corporation.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:Legal_history_of_California.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:Reinsurance.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California subject Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type Case.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type LegalCase.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type UnitOfWork.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type Event.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California type Situation.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California comment "Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, 113 S.Ct. 2891 (1993), was a controversial United States Supreme Court case which held that foreign companies acting in foreign countries could nevertheless be held liable for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act if they conspired to restrain trade within the United States, and succeeded in doing so.".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California label "Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California".
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California sameAs m.05s0q9.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California sameAs Q5674477.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California sameAs Q5674477.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California wasDerivedFrom Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California?oldid=580104969.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California isPrimaryTopicOf Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California.
- Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California name "Hartford Fire Insurance Company, et al., Petitioners 91-1111 v. California, et al.; and Merrett Underwriting Agency Management Limited, et al., Petitioners 91-1128 v. California, et al.".