Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_DoubleClick> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 items per page.
- In_re_DoubleClick abstract "In re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy Litigation, 154 F. Supp. 2d 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) ("DoubleClick"), had Internet users initiate proceedings against DoubleClick, alleging that DoubleClick's placement of web cookies on computer hard drives of Internet users who accessed DoubleClick-affiliated web sites constituted violations of three federal laws: The Stored Communications Act, the Wiretap Statute and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.The court held that DoubleClick was not liable under any of the three federal laws because it fell within the consent exceptions under the Stored Communications Act and the Wiretap Statute. DoubleClick was not excluded from the consent exception of the Wiretap Statute because it did not intercept the communications for criminal or tortious purposes. DoubleClick was also not liable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act because the plaintiffs had failed to meet the statutory threshold of $5,000 in losses. The court established that damages under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act may only be aggregated for the unauthorized access of each cookie.".
- In_re_DoubleClick wikiPageExternalLink doubleclickobjection.pdf.
- In_re_DoubleClick wikiPageExternalLink Privacy:_Key_Cases.
- In_re_DoubleClick wikiPageExternalLink privaterightofaction2.shtml.
- In_re_DoubleClick wikiPageID "22032842".
- In_re_DoubleClick wikiPageRevisionID "549860732".
- In_re_DoubleClick citations "172800.0".
- In_re_DoubleClick court United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York.
- In_re_DoubleClick dateDecided "Mar. 28, 2001".
- In_re_DoubleClick hasPhotoCollection In_re_DoubleClick.
- In_re_DoubleClick holding "DoubleClick's placement of web browser cookies on computer hard drives of internet users who accessed DoubleClick-affiliated web sites did not violate the Stored Communications Act, the Wiretap Statute or the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.".
- In_re_DoubleClick judge Naomi_Reice_Buchwald.
- In_re_DoubleClick keywords Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act.
- In_re_DoubleClick keywords Omnibus_Crime_Control_and_Safe_Streets_Act_of_1968.
- In_re_DoubleClick keywords Privacy_law.
- In_re_DoubleClick keywords Stored_Communications_Act.
- In_re_DoubleClick name "In re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy Litigation".
- In_re_DoubleClick subsequentActions "Complaint dismissed and judgment entered by In re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy Litig., No. 00-0641, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27099 .".
- In_re_DoubleClick subject Category:2001_in_United_States_case_law.
- In_re_DoubleClick subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- In_re_DoubleClick subject Category:United_States_privacy_case_law.
- In_re_DoubleClick comment "In re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy Litigation, 154 F. Supp. 2d 497 (S.D.N.Y.".
- In_re_DoubleClick label "In re DoubleClick".
- In_re_DoubleClick sameAs m.05p10nw.
- In_re_DoubleClick sameAs Q6011667.
- In_re_DoubleClick sameAs Q6011667.
- In_re_DoubleClick wasDerivedFrom In_re_DoubleClick?oldid=549860732.
- In_re_DoubleClick isPrimaryTopicOf In_re_DoubleClick.