Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jurney_v._MacCracken> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 items per page.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken abstract "Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress has an implicit power to find one in contempt of Congress. During a Senate investigation of airlines and of the U.S. Postmaster General, the attorney William P. MacCracken, Jr. allowed his clients to destroy subpoenaed documents. After a one-week trial on the Senate floor (presided over by the Vice-President of the United States, acting as Senate President), MacCracken, a lawyer and former Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Aeronautics, was found guilty and sentenced to 10 days imprisonment. MacCracken filed a petition of Habeas Corpus with the federal courts to overturn his arrest, but, after litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress had acted constitutionally, and denied the petition.".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken wikiPageID "31013834".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken wikiPageRevisionID "559601420".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken decideyear "1935".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken fullname "Jurney v. MacCracken".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken hasPhotoCollection Jurney_v._MacCracken.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken holding "That Congress has an implicit power to find one in contempt of Congress".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken litigants "Jurney v. MacCracken".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken majority "Brandeis".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken scotus "1932".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken uspage "125".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken usvol "294".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken subject Category:1935_in_law.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken type Case.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken type LegalCase.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken type UnitOfWork.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken type Situation.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken comment "Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress has an implicit power to find one in contempt of Congress. During a Senate investigation of airlines and of the U.S. Postmaster General, the attorney William P. MacCracken, Jr. allowed his clients to destroy subpoenaed documents.".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken label "Jurney v. MacCracken".
- Jurney_v._MacCracken sameAs m.0gg5kb2.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken sameAs Q15147973.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken sameAs Q15147973.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken wasDerivedFrom Jurney_v._MacCracken?oldid=559601420.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken isPrimaryTopicOf Jurney_v._MacCracken.
- Jurney_v._MacCracken name "Jurney v. MacCracken".