Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Just-world_hypothesis> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Just-world_hypothesis abstract "The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions always bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, so that all noble actions are eventually rewarded and all evil actions are eventually punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of—a universal force that restores moral balance. The fallacy is that this implies (often unintentionally) the existence of cosmic justice, Karma, Destiny, Divine providence, desert, stability, or order, and may also serve to rationalize people's misfortune on the grounds that they deserve it.The hypothesis popularly appears in the English language in various figures of speech that imply guaranteed negative reprisal, such as: "You got what was coming to you", "What goes around comes around", and "You reap what you sow". This hypothesis has been widely studied by social psychologists since Melvin J. Lerner conducted seminal work on the belief in a just world in the early 1960s. Research has continued since then, examining the predictive capacity of the hypothesis in various situations and across cultures, and clarifying and expanding the theoretical understandings of just-world beliefs.".
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageExternalLink Hafer_Begue_05.pdf.
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageExternalLink Rubin%20%26%20Peplau%201975s.pdf.
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageExternalLink Rubin_Peplau_73.pdf.
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageExternalLink justworld.html.
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageExternalLink index.shtml.
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageID "855980".
- Just-world_hypothesis wikiPageRevisionID "606581594".
- Just-world_hypothesis date "February 2014".
- Just-world_hypothesis hasPhotoCollection Just-world_hypothesis.
- Just-world_hypothesis reason "I assume you mean to say 'neither just nor predictable.'".
- Just-world_hypothesis subject Category:Bullying.
- Just-world_hypothesis subject Category:Cognitive_biases.
- Just-world_hypothesis subject Category:Conceptual_models.
- Just-world_hypothesis subject Category:Hypotheses.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Abstraction100002137.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Attitude106193203.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Bias106201908.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Cognition100023271.
- Just-world_hypothesis type CognitiveBiases.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Inclination106196584.
- Just-world_hypothesis type Partiality106201136.
- Just-world_hypothesis type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Just-world_hypothesis comment "The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions always bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, so that all noble actions are eventually rewarded and all evil actions are eventually punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of—a universal force that restores moral balance.".
- Just-world_hypothesis label "Fenomen sprawiedliwego świata".
- Just-world_hypothesis label "Gerechte-Welt-Glaube".
- Just-world_hypothesis label "Ipotesi del mondo giusto".
- Just-world_hypothesis label "Just-world hypothesis".
- Just-world_hypothesis label "Вера в справедливый мир".
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Gerechte-Welt-Glaube.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Ipotesi_del_mondo_giusto.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Fenomen_sprawiedliwego_świata.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs m.03hn4y.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Q1511079.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Q1511079.
- Just-world_hypothesis sameAs Just-world_hypothesis.
- Just-world_hypothesis wasDerivedFrom Just-world_hypothesis?oldid=606581594.
- Just-world_hypothesis isPrimaryTopicOf Just-world_hypothesis.