Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kunz_v._New_York> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Kunz_v._New_York abstract "Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, by vote of 8 to 1. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion for the Court. Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter concurred in the result only. Justice Jackson dissented. Kunz helped establish that government restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored so that they do not inappropriately limit expression protected by the First Amendment. In Kunz, the Court held that laws giving public officials broad discretion to restrain speech about religious issues in advance are an invalid prior restraint in violation of the First Amendment. The Court reversed the 1948 conviction of Baptist minister Carl J. Kunz for violating a New York City ordinance that prohibited religious services on public streets without a permit from the police commissioner. Although the ordinance specified no grounds for refusing permission to speak, Kunz was denied permits in 1947 and 1948 after he was accused of “scurrilous attacks” on Catholics and Jews under a previous permit. Kunz was arrested for speaking without a permit in Columbus Circle.Kunz's conviction for violating the ordinance was upheld by the Appellate Part of the Court of Special Sessions and by the New York Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court said that New York's ordinance was too broad because it provided no standards that an administrator could use to determine who ought to receive permits to speak about religious issues. In dissent, Justice Robert Jackson said Kunz had used “fighting words” that were not protected by the First Amendment (see Unprotected Speech). He also criticized the Court for striking down the permit scheme when it had, in Feiner v. New York (1951), allowed local officials the discretion to arrest volatile speakers during their presentations.".
- Kunz_v._New_York wikiPageID "13526763".
- Kunz_v._New_York wikiPageRevisionID "604030772".
- Kunz_v._New_York arguedate "--10-17".
- Kunz_v._New_York argueyear "1950".
- Kunz_v._New_York concurrence "Black".
- Kunz_v._New_York concurrence "Frankfurter".
- Kunz_v._New_York decidedate "--01-15".
- Kunz_v._New_York decideyear "1951".
- Kunz_v._New_York dissent "Jackson".
- Kunz_v._New_York fullname "Kunz v. New York".
- Kunz_v._New_York hasPhotoCollection Kunz_v._New_York.
- Kunz_v._New_York joinmajority "Reed, Douglas, Burton, Clark, Minton".
- Kunz_v._New_York litigants "Kunz v. New York".
- Kunz_v._New_York majority "Vinson".
- Kunz_v._New_York scotus "1949".
- Kunz_v._New_York uspage "290".
- Kunz_v._New_York usvol "340".
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:1951_in_United_States_case_law.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:Anti-Catholicism_in_the_United_States.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:Antisemitism_in_the_United_States.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:Baptist_Christianity_in_New_York.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:Columbus_Circle.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Kunz_v._New_York subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Kunz_v._New_York type Case.
- Kunz_v._New_York type LegalCase.
- Kunz_v._New_York type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Kunz_v._New_York type UnitOfWork.
- Kunz_v._New_York type Event.
- Kunz_v._New_York type Situation.
- Kunz_v._New_York comment "Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, by vote of 8 to 1. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion for the Court. Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter concurred in the result only. Justice Jackson dissented.".
- Kunz_v._New_York label "Kunz v. New York".
- Kunz_v._New_York sameAs m.03c89z4.
- Kunz_v._New_York sameAs Q6445172.
- Kunz_v._New_York sameAs Q6445172.
- Kunz_v._New_York wasDerivedFrom Kunz_v._New_York?oldid=604030772.
- Kunz_v._New_York isPrimaryTopicOf Kunz_v._New_York.
- Kunz_v._New_York name "Kunz v. New York".