Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States> ?p ?o. }

• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States abstract "Log Cabin Republicans v. United States was a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, commonly known as don't ask, don't tell (DADT), which excludes homosexuals from openly serving in the United States military. The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR), an organization composed of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Republicans, brought the suit on behalf of LCR members who serve or served in the military and were subject to DADT.LCR initially filed the suit, a facial challenge to the statute, in 2004. A bench trial began on July 13, 2010, before Judge Virginia A. Phillips of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Justice Department had unsuccessfully sought to have the suit dismissed, arguing that as long as Congress had a rational basis for passing DADT in 1993, then it is constitutional. The Justice Department also asserted at trial that LCR did not have standing to challenge the law. LCR argued that DADT violates constitutional guarantees of due process and free speech.Phillips advised the parties pre-trial that she would not apply rational basis review, the lowest level of constitutional scrutiny, to the case. Instead, in accordance with the ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Witt v. Department of the Air Force, she would apply intermediate scrutiny, meaning to be constitutional, DADT must significantly further an important governmental interest that can be advanced in no other way.On September 9, 2010, Phillips ruled that the ban is unconstitutional. On October 12, Phillips issued an injunction banning the military from enforcing the policy. She subsequently denied the government's request for a stay of the injunction, and the government then took their request to the Ninth Circuit, which granted a stay. On November 12, the United States Supreme Court denied an application by the Log Cabin Republicans to vacate the stay. The Ninth Circuit vacated the stay on July 6, 2011, and ordered an end to enforcement of DADT. On September 29, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued a per curiam opinion that the legislative repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" had rendered the case moot.".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg?width=300.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink PhillipsDecision.pdf.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink 2CV04-8425-VAP.pdf.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States wikiPageID "28060766".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "587211148".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States citations "25920.0".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States concurrence "Diarmuid O'Scannlain".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States court "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States courtseal "100".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States decidedate "--09-29".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States decideyear "2011".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States fullname "Log Cabin Republicans, a non-profit corporation v. United States of America and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity,".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States holding "The legislative repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell rendered the case moot and the decision of the lower court finding DADT unconstitutional is vacated.".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States judges Arthur_Lawrence_Alarcon.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States judges Barry_G._Silverman.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States judges Diarmuid_O'Scannlain.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States litigants "Log Cabin Republicans v. United States".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States majority Per_curiam_decision.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States prior "17280.0".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subsequent "Rehearing en banc denied".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:2010_in_LGBT_history.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:2011_in_LGBT_history.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:2011_in_United_States_case_law.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:Don't_ask,_don't_tell.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:Sexual_orientation_and_the_United_States_military.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_LGBT_rights_case_law.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_military_case_law.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States comment "Log Cabin Republicans v. United States was a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, commonly known as don't ask, don't tell (DADT), which excludes homosexuals from openly serving in the United States military.".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States label "Log Cabin Republicans v. United States".
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States sameAs m.0cmdn8s.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States sameAs Q6528293.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States sameAs Q6528293.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States?oldid=587211148.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg.
• Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States.