Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Maryland_v._King> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 items per page.
- Maryland_v._King abstract "Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___ (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold for a serious offense and bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment."While the case centered on Maryland's DNA collection practices, which only apply to people arrested for "serious crimes like murder, rape, assault, burglary and other crimes of violence," the Court's decision did not specify whether it was limited to serious crimes or any crime. In his dissent, joined by three liberal justices of the court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia warned that "because of today's decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason." Justice Scalia took the rare step of reading his dissent from the bench, "signaling deep disagreement" on the Court.".
- Maryland_v._King wikiPageExternalLink 16.-Roth.pdf.
- Maryland_v._King wikiPageExternalLink =.
- Maryland_v._King wikiPageExternalLink 2012_11_207=.
- Maryland_v._King wikiPageID "39567604".
- Maryland_v._King wikiPageRevisionID "595281079".
- Maryland_v._King arguedate "--02-26".
- Maryland_v._King argueyear "2013".
- Maryland_v._King decidedate "--06-03".
- Maryland_v._King decideyear "2013".
- Maryland_v._King dissent "Scalia".
- Maryland_v._King docket "12".
- Maryland_v._King fullname "Maryland, Petitioner v. Alonzo Jay King, Jr.".
- Maryland_v._King holding ""When officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold for a serious offense and bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment."".
- Maryland_v._King joindissent "Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan".
- Maryland_v._King joinmajority "Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Alito".
- Maryland_v._King lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Maryland_v._King litigants "Maryland v. King".
- Maryland_v._King majority "Kennedy".
- Maryland_v._King parallelcitations "133".
- Maryland_v._King scotus "2010".
- Maryland_v._King uspage "___".
- Maryland_v._King usvol "569".
- Maryland_v._King subject Category:2013_in_law.
- Maryland_v._King subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Maryland_v._King subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Maryland_v._King type Case.
- Maryland_v._King type LegalCase.
- Maryland_v._King type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Maryland_v._King type UnitOfWork.
- Maryland_v._King type Situation.
- Maryland_v._King comment "Maryland v. King, 569 U.S.".
- Maryland_v._King label "Maryland v. King".
- Maryland_v._King sameAs m.0vxfcl7.
- Maryland_v._King sameAs Q15147978.
- Maryland_v._King sameAs Q15147978.
- Maryland_v._King wasDerivedFrom Maryland_v._King?oldid=595281079.
- Maryland_v._King isPrimaryTopicOf Maryland_v._King.
- Maryland_v._King name "Maryland, Petitioner v. Alonzo Jay King, Jr.".