Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/McKune_v._Lile> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- McKune_v._Lile abstract "McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that Kansas' Sexual Abuse Treatment Program (SATP) served a vital penological purpose and determined that allowing minimal incentives to take part in the SATP does not equal compelled self-incrimination as prohibited by the Fifth Amendment. There were three main points to the case that were used to determine the SATPs were constitutional as summarized by the National District Attorneys Association (NDAA). These included the distinct findings that, “[t]he SATP in Kansas is supported by the legitimate penological objective of rehabilitation”, that, “the fact that Kansas does not offer immunity or privilege in response to statements made by participants does not render the SATP invalid under the [fifth] amendment”, and that the, “consequences that follow for nonparticipation, no not, under the Kansas plan, combine to create compulsion, thereby infringing upon the participant’s [fifth] amendment right”. Due to the plurality of the case, no singular decision was held as a majority.".
- McKune_v._Lile wikiPageID "35302179".
- McKune_v._Lile wikiPageRevisionID "522009220".
- McKune_v._Lile arguedate "--11-28".
- McKune_v._Lile argueyear "2001".
- McKune_v._Lile concurrence "O'Connor".
- McKune_v._Lile decidedate "--06-10".
- McKune_v._Lile decideyear "2002".
- McKune_v._Lile dissent "Stevens".
- McKune_v._Lile fullname "McKune, Warden, et al. v. Robert G. Lile".
- McKune_v._Lile hasPhotoCollection McKune_v._Lile.
- McKune_v._Lile holding "The state's consequences for non-participants of the SATP program does not constitute a violation of the respondent's Fifth Amendment rights.".
- McKune_v._Lile joindissent "Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- McKune_v._Lile joinmajority "Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas".
- McKune_v._Lile litigants "McKune v. Lile".
- McKune_v._Lile majority "Kennedy".
- McKune_v._Lile scotus "1994".
- McKune_v._Lile uspage "24".
- McKune_v._Lile usvol "536".
- McKune_v._Lile subject Category:2002_in_law.
- McKune_v._Lile subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- McKune_v._Lile type Case.
- McKune_v._Lile type LegalCase.
- McKune_v._Lile type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- McKune_v._Lile type UnitOfWork.
- McKune_v._Lile type Situation.
- McKune_v._Lile comment "McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that Kansas' Sexual Abuse Treatment Program (SATP) served a vital penological purpose and determined that allowing minimal incentives to take part in the SATP does not equal compelled self-incrimination as prohibited by the Fifth Amendment.".
- McKune_v._Lile label "McKune v. Lile".
- McKune_v._Lile sameAs m.0j7n0l3.
- McKune_v._Lile sameAs Q6802035.
- McKune_v._Lile sameAs Q6802035.
- McKune_v._Lile wasDerivedFrom McKune_v._Lile?oldid=522009220.
- McKune_v._Lile isPrimaryTopicOf McKune_v._Lile.
- McKune_v._Lile name "McKune, Warden, et al. v. Robert G. Lile".