Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye abstract "Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077 is the leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the enforcement of extraprovincial judgments. The Court held that the standard for enforcing a default judgment from a different province is not the same as if it were from another country; rather the Court adopts the test from Indyka v. Indyka, [1969] 1 A.C. 33 (H.L.) and the Moran v. Pyle National (Canada) Ltd., [1975] 1 S.C.R. 393 where there must be a "real and substantial connection" between the petitioner and the country or territory exercising jurisdiction.".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye wikiPageID "3683561".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye wikiPageRevisionID "521686392".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye caseName "Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye citations "[1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye decidedDate "1990-12-20".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye docket "21116".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye fullCaseName "Douglas De Savoye v. Morguard Investments Limited and Credit Foncier Trust Company".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye hasPhotoCollection Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye heardDate "1990-04-23".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye ratio "A foreign judgment from another province will be enforced where there is a "real and substantial connection" to the forum".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye ruling "De Savoye appeal dismissed".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye scc "1989".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye unanimous "La Forest J.".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye subject Category:1990_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye subject Category:Canadian_civil_procedure_case_law.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye subject Category:Conflict_of_laws_case_law.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye comment "Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077 is the leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the enforcement of extraprovincial judgments. The Court held that the standard for enforcing a default judgment from a different province is not the same as if it were from another country; rather the Court adopts the test from Indyka v. Indyka, [1969] 1 A.C. 33 (H.L.) and the Moran v. Pyle National (Canada) Ltd., [1975] 1 S.C.R.".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye label "Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye".
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye sameAs m.09v7tt.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye sameAs Q6912076.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye sameAs Q6912076.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye wasDerivedFrom Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye?oldid=521686392.
- Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye isPrimaryTopicOf Morguard_Investments_Ltd._v._De_Savoye.