Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm abstract "Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm, 463 U.S. 29 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars. In it, the Court struck down an order by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rescinding regulations requiring either airbags or automatic seat belts in new cars. The Court held that the arbitrary and capricious standard for reviewing agency actions applied to rescinding regulations the same as to enacting regulations. It also held that the rescission of the rule requiring some sort of passive restraint was arbitrary and capricious because it failed to consider the alternative of requiring all cars to have airbags. Finally, it held that the agency dismissed the safety benefits of automatic seat belts too quickly.The case is noteworthy not only for its effects on car safety, but also in clarifying the Supreme Court's approach to reviewing agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm wikiPageID "42510998".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm wikiPageRevisionID "604699888".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm arguedate "--04-26".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm argueyear "1983".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm citation "172800.0".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm dissent "Rehnquist".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm decidedate "--06-24".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm decideyear "1983".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm docket "82".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm fullname "Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc., et al. v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company et al; Consumer Alert, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al.; United States Department of Transportation, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm holding "The standard of review for rescinding notice and comment rules is the same as that for enacting rules. The rescission was arbitrary and capricious for failing to consider the alternative of requiring airbags, and for too quickly dismissing the benefits of automatic seat belts.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm dissent "Burger, Powell, and O'Connor".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm joinmajority "unanimous ; Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, and Stevens".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm lawsapplied Administrative_Procedure_Act.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm litigants "Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm majority "White".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm oralargument argument.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm prior "The DC Circuit found that the NHTSA's rulemaking was arbitrary and capricious.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm subsequent "The DC Circuit upheld the rulemaking.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm uspage "29".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm usvol "463".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm subject Category:1983_in_United_States_case_law.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm subject Category:United_States_administrative_case_law.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm subject Category:United_States_statutory_interpretation_case_law.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm type Case.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm type LegalCase.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm type UnitOfWork.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm type Situation.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm comment "Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm, 463 U.S. 29 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars. In it, the Court struck down an order by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rescinding regulations requiring either airbags or automatic seat belts in new cars.".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm label "Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm".
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm sameAs m.010f95gt.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm sameAs Q17110683.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm sameAs Q17110683.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm wasDerivedFrom Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm?oldid=604699888.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm isPrimaryTopicOf Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm.
- Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm name "Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc., et al. v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company et al; Consumer Alert, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al.; United States Department of Transportation, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al.".